Nov 22, 2008

Should I Delete Their Names and Pictures?

I have received the same comment - twice! I think it's from the same person because he or she said the same things.

Apparently one or more of the three are accused of additional crimes which they are yet to stand trial for (presumably Jason Owen is not since there is no court order restricting publishing of his name). Note that the court order also prohibits any mention of Baby P's potential siblings, and also prohibits mention of the reason why their names are being withheld.

If you really want justice to be served, delete all mention of their names until all proceedings are finished. Otherwise, they can argue that a fair trial isn't possible and have the charges dropped.

Let's allow them to get the maximum jail sentences they can -- then you can publish their names and photos.
Do you agree?

Related Stories:
Tracey Connelley, Baby P’s Evil Mom, Shows No Remorse

Baby P’ Stepfather – Evil Sadistic Monster

Baby P’s Murderers – Why Are They Being Protected?

Baby P’s Mother Gets 5 Years? WTF?





"Review My Post and Get Paid! Seriously!"

22 Gorgeous People Said --:

Anonymous said...

I don't get why they deserve protection of their identities. These people shouldn't have rights, they took all of Baby P's away, so why they should get it is beyond me. I'm glad their names and pictures are out because even if justice isn't served and the don't spend long enough in jail, it is my hope that someone will recognise them and give them everything they deserve. These bastards will want to stay in jail when everyone finds out who they are. They are safer in jail. I reckon that they are sentenced to stand in a sea of mothers and fathers of young children. I'm sure they wouldn't survive.

Anonymous said...

I think the safest thing would be to remove the names and pictures temporarily. You can then put them back after the trial. [Their legal defence will try anything to get them off the hook, no matter what they've done]. As you know, their defence is now trying to argue that the mother should have round the clock protection and anonymity when she comes out. It's absolutely disgusting and sickening, if you ask me.
Charmaine

Anonymous said...

noo you shouldnt protect their identity!!! every1 should what sick basterds they really are !! THEY DESERVE FOR PEOPLE TO NOT THEIR NAMES IT DUSNT MATTER WHAT PEOPLE ARW RYTING TO YOU SAYING ABOUT THEIR NAMES ITS BABY PETER THAT MATTERS THINK OF HIM! XXXX

Anonymous said...

I think the only reason why they want to protect their identities is the woman's other children and how this whole thing will affect them. People might decide to avenge Peter's death by hurting/kidnapping his siblings.

kiwiAngelNorthland said...

I agree with the sentiments of everyone regarding Baby P. In no way am I devending those evil bastards, but there is a reason WHY they're names/faces must not being shown. The mother and the step-father are due to stand trial next year for another horrific crime. Their legal team will argue that because of their id's have been published they will not get a fair trial. Please do not id them, as we want to get them convicted for this other crime.

Anonymous said...

In countless trials names and faces are shown during and even before the trial. Why should these fuckers be treated different?

Anonymous said...

i agree their names and photos should be shown, all the people involed in not saving baby p even the girl how knew but didnt say anything should carry this with them for aslong as they live .BRING BACK THE DEATH PENALTY FOR THE MOTHER , STEPDAD AND LODGER!

Anonymous said...

I say publish their pictures and names as many places as possible. So what if their lawyer gets them off on a technicality...how long do you think scum like that would survive on the street once their identities are known? There is more than one way to achieve justice!!

Anonymous said...

Lets see the horrors who did this.

Why keep their vile secret 1 second longer.

That little boy had to in live with this secret, the torture he had to endure on a daily basis. Why keep their vile secret 1 second longer.

let them have a bit of it too.

Please do not take their pictures down.

Someone somewhere needs to show this child that people do care.

Anonymous said...

the woman and man are in court for further charges on the 3 year old girl, there names are not allowed to be published due to these further charges and to protect the 3 year old girl.The other charges are horrific.

Anonymous said...

Yes remove otherwise you are helping the convcted torturers case to stop their next trial remove to help get justice

Anonymous said...

regardless of their names mentioned or not do we all think theyll get a gwd anough sentence for this new crime none of them didnt even get charged with murder for baby p which it clearly was! the system is fucked up while we all stand by and ignore it that is how it will be i say realease the photos every1 shud know who these vile pple are and it shud never be aloud to happen again....I hope they all rot

Anonymous said...

you should leave there names and photos so that the public and world should realise anybody could harm young children and be alert next time

Anonymous said...

Please remove. What do you gain by showing this? Knowing who they are isn't going to stop the cruelty of other children thats happening all the time around you. Denouncing people who you think are abusing their children will. The person who wrote that obviously is quite reasonable and intelligent, there are reasons why their identities are being hidden. like they said "If you really want justice to be served, delete all mention of their names until all proceedings are finished. Otherwise, they can argue that a fair trial isn't possible and have the charges dropped." Do you really want to be the reason why these people get an easy sentance? People only really want to see who they are to gossip or to put a name/image to someone who they can (quite rightfully) blame ( assuming that they did do it, although pretty much all of the evidence so far suggests that they are guilty.)

Anonymous said...

I find it unbelievable that social workers and a 'so called' GP did not pick up on this abuse! Of course it is unbelievable that human beings can do this too anyone, never mind a small defenseless child, but, why did the abuse go un-noticed by professionals (or so called).

Not only should photo's be shown, social workers and the GP should lose any right to work within their profession again.

RIP Baby P . . . Justice will be served !

Anonymous said...

Don't remove it leave it!!!!!. They killed Baby P. Why should that idiot of mother get a knew name. Leave their pic's because they have shown idiots like them faces before on tv even before the trail so why do they get good treatment and be diferent. Hope she roits for ever and she get life in prison.

Unknown said...

How about this?

Take down there names and pictures and make up
place cards and distribute them to the inmates in the prisons that they are housed in.

Anonymous said...

Why are some people so stupid? We are not trying to protect evil murderers identities. What we are trying to do is ensure that they do not claim an unfair trial for whatever atrocity it is that they are being tried for next. Please remove their details for the time being so they can get the maximum sentance - I dread to think what else they have done.

Anonymous said...

urm assuming they actually did it??!!! r u thick?? they have even confessed to it!! the child didnt do it to himself did he! no please dont remove their names! they have no right to their human rights anymore - I have memorised her face and as soon as she gets out I will hunt her down and kill her. I have a 3 month old son and the thought of what she did - what they all did to that poor baby makes me sick. justice wud b every injury inflicted to them that that poor baby had done to him and then hung drawn and quartered. naming these bastards means that even if they get a lighter sentence the public will get justice when they come out. this woman is laughing in court when what happened to her child is read out and I think that protecting there identitys so they get longer in prison is bullshit. no one protected that child - what the fuck is happening in britain today that tracey connelly has more human rights then her little son. I am so angry about this case and I think that anyone in favour of protecting the identitys of these monsters (including the twat a couple of comments above who suggested that they might not have even done it) should fuck off. So that monster gets out of prison with her new identity n say moves next door to me - as a mother do I not have a right to know who she really is n what shes done!! think about it ur obviously not a parent if u want to keep the name tracey connelly quiet!!

Anonymous said...

I am a mother and it sickens me to read about the abuse of baby P. I am also training to be a social worker as I would like to work in child protection and try to prevent abuse of children. Do not equate social workers with the perpetrators of this crime - front line social workers who have to go into disfunctional families like this( often at great personal risk) tried to get baby P out of there - but they were stopped by people higher up the chain. I'm afraid it all came down to money. The world is an evil place and there are evil people intent on harming children. Social workers are NOT evil - they are doing a difficult job which many people wouldn't touch with a bargepole.

Anonymous said...

I am posting it all over the web so it doesnt matter if you delete yours.

Anonymous said...

To the person who asked why there weren't charged with murder - they were, the JURY found them all not guilty of that charge, hence the lesser charges of causing or allowing the death of a child. There is to be a third trial regarding one of the other children, hence their names are again withheld